“There are
only two kinds of people when it comes to AI: Those who see it as the future,
and Luddites.”
Someone in
a college administration said that. They’re a “young gun,” and I remember being
like them, excited about every single new technology arriving on the scene and
what it can do with “data.” I still can be that way, and I can certainly
understand the excitement for artificial intelligence.
But I also
know an “either/or” logical fallacy when I see one. Closer scrutiny of the
situation is more apt to bring someone to somewhere in the muddy middle of that
kid’s assertion…as is so often the case.
See that
cartoon? Upon close reading, I’m sure you’ll find it quite clever. It also
encapsulates my greatest concern regarding AI, namely that we will come to
entirely outsource our thinking. You ask for what you want and it gives it to
you, and you take it without thinking. I see a similar behavior all the time
with students and others who do a Google search on a given subject, grab the
first three entries that bubble to the top, and think they have all they need
to know. It will be tough to persuade me people won’t carry out the same
behavior with AI only at scale.
Kurzweil’s
new book, according reviews in the Times and The Economist anyway, utters the
common refrain that AI will free us from mundane tasks. Cool. He goes on to say
that millions of workers will be “liberated.”
That’s an
odd, Orwellian term for “unemployment.”
Because he
also predicts that in five years, AI will be able to write whole books and
create art indistinguishable from human work. If so, just what will my family
and I to do with all of my newfound “liberation?” Said “liberation” would, in
fact, be a loss of self. Libertarians might argue, “Suck it up, buttercup.
Market success means changing what you do.” Well, changing what I do is pretty
much the same thing as changing who I am.
Ain’t so
easy. I don’t think it will be easy for a lot of other people, either, even
coders.
There are
amazing things in the offing with AI. Medical treatments. Scientific
discoveries. Anything that once required humans to take painstaking efforts to
see patterns in data can be done in comparatively brief amounts of time. Good
stuff. I just don’t think it makes one a “Luddite” to want to take a critical
eye to what’s happening, and maybe pump the brakes for a moment.
At least
we won’t ever have to worry about an AI being categorized as “alive,” or so a biologist argues from a mechanistic perspective. (see comments)
But hey.
We’re getting an AI-generated Al Michaels for the upcoming Olympics. So we got
that going for us.
Which
is…nice?
